Different Opinions Make Life Interesting

The Blogging Experience

2004-12-09T13:27:00.000-08:00

December 9, 2004
Although it is sad to say, this is the last entry I will ever write in my blog. In closing this chapter of my life, I would like to say this has been a really positive experience for me. Writing about my thoughts has definitely allowed me to grasp a deeper understanding of the material in this course, and forced me to figure out where I stood on many controversial issues. Once you figure out your standpoint on many social issues as a teacher, it is easier to prevent your biases from sneaking into the classroom. This is something many teachers struggle with, but from where I stand, being aware of my weaknesses is the first step to overcoming them right?
The only downside to this assessment method is the reliance on technology. There were many times I tried to publish a blog, and it just disappeared. Luckily, I had these entries saved in Microsoft Word! However, I think I spent more time trying to publish my work on the net than actually writing it.
All glitches aside, being forced to work with computers did wonders for overcoming my fear of technology though. I now see the important role that technology can play in the classroom, and will make more of an effort to foster this frame of mind in my students. For example, if I decide to implement a reflective journal component in my evaluation of student learning, I will be more inclined to use the World Wide Web as my facilitating medium instead of the old-fashioned pen and paper. Chances are, the World Wide Web will facilitate more discussion, and produce greater feedback because one’s audience is dramatically increased.
I think this is a great assessment option that should continue to be used in the Society and Education class. It gives students a certain degree of freedom since you can make contributions to the blog at whatever time of day is convenient for you. As well, it definitely increases communication in the classroom setting, which helps foster the development of a sense of community. This sense of community is something I’ve come to cherish, as I get higher up in your years of study, and school takes up so much time.
In the future though, it might be worthwhile to consider decreasing the amount of entries students have to do to ensure that people actually make comments. I will admit that as the semester wore on, it was difficult to find the time to read what everyone else was writing; let alone comment on what was being said. Although I do not take personal offense, it is impossible to deny that the readership of my blog dramatically declined. Being forced to write three entries a week can also have a major impact on the quality of entries produced by some people. I will admit I found this assignment to be quite time consuming. However, because I considered the exercise worthwhile, I didn’t seem to mind the intense amount of work.

The Responsibility of Teachers Surrounding the Issue of Sexual Imaging in the Media

2004-12-09T13:24:00.000-08:00

December 8, 2004
Today’s presentation dealt with the very disturbing yet unmistakably real issue of sexual imaging in the media. While the message being communicated was something that everyone in our class seemed to repeatedly criticize, we can’t deny the impact this kind of advertising is having on society in general (especially our precious children). I think we have to take a step back and re-evaluate the usefulness of this presentation from a teacher’s perspective.
Many children are falling victim on a daily basis to the images these ads are portraying. The most common comment from the girls is the desire to be like Brittany Spears or Jessica Simpson. However, the pressure to be something you’re not is also felt in the boys’ camp. Many young men are fully aware of the fascination that girls have with celebs like Usher and Johnny Depp, and struggle to figure out how they can compete for a girl’s attention.
Since these images gain attention and boost sales, they are not simply going to disappear. We as educators have to teach our students how to love and accept themselves for who they are. Otherwise, our society is doomed to a reality of huge therapy bills dealing with problems like: eating disorders, depression, STD’s, and excessive drug and alcohol use. Of course the real danger of these images becomes apparent when kids start dying in the process of striving towards what many would describe as unattainable goals.
Even though I never fell victim to the pressure of looking or acting a certain way, I have a friend from high school who struggles to control her eating disorder. To make matters worse, I never knew about it until she came to me at wits end begging for help. She explained to me that in an average day, she was throwing up six or seven times. She admitted to not being able to keep food in her system longer than about an hour, and she exercised like crazy. When I listened to her stories, I was angered. Here was this amazing girl-smart, funny, and extremely outgoing who hated herself because the media constantly told her she didn’t fit the bill of beauty!
From a male perspective, my brother constantly informs me that you have to wear the right clothes, and be buff to have a beautiful girlfriend. For Christmas this year, my brother asked for two things-a drum set and a weight set. He’s only 13! However, the pressure to conform to an ideal image is extremely strong. For those who will never achieve the “desired” look, my brother says the only way they could ever get a girl is to become a rebel (a.k.a. do drugs, get suspended from school, steal, cheat on tests, have unprotected sex, and constantly lie without getting caught). How horrible is that!
Even though having Jessica Simpson or Usher grace the cover of a popular magazine will ultimately boost sales, we have to stop and ask ourselves “Is this worth the price we’re having to pay?” I mean obviously the lives of our children hang in the balance. We should not have the right to rob them of what should be coined a “wonderful childhood” simply because we have to make a profit.
As teachers, we can teach our students to respect their bodies and build self-esteem. It is crucial that everyone believes beauty comes from within, and is not wrapped up in a certain image (i.e. blonde hair, big boobs, tiny waste, six-pack, body muscle etc). We need to foster the development of individual talents, and strengthen the association of success with hard work and intelligence. As I stated above, focus on the importance of loving yourself for who you are. If it helps, expose the fraudulence of the media, and Barbie (if your audience is that young). Plus, highlight how boring life would be if we all looked exactly the same; our differences are what attract other people to be our friends and life partners. We should not be ashamed of our uniqueness.
Most importantly, just be aware of what the students in your classroom are reading and watching! If you come across something unpleasant or hear inappropriate comments, try to address these issues through your lessons. I know I will certainly make an effort after hearing and observing the impact media has had on people near and dear to my heart. It absolutely disgusts me!

Life as a Drifter

2004-12-09T13:22:00.000-08:00

December 6, 2004
I found today’s class presentation on Social Groups in High School to be quite interesting. As someone who came from a small town, many people are quick to assume that there were many cliques in my school, and that naturally, I had to fit in somewhere. However, I was always the girl bouncing from social group to social group. This was largely due to the fact that I had trouble making close friends.
I guess you could say I had an issue with trusting people (especially in my teen years) because I was always the subject of a “few good laughs” as many would say. My physical disability made me an easy target. While most people would say having no close friends in your teen years would be difficult, I turned this unfortunate situation into something very positive.
Because I had no close ties to any particular social group, I became someone people could talk to about their problems. Soon, I acquired a reputation for being a good listener and offering sound advice. I guess you could give me the unofficial title of guidance counselor/therapist. Depending on the day, people would see me in the school cafeteria talking to the popular girls, the nerds, the jocks, the drama/band geeks, the artists, the cowboys, or even the skids. I think people from all different cliques were drawn to me because I passed no judgment on them, and treated them like human beings regardless of the circulating so-called “popular opinion”(a.k.a. gossip).
The variety of people that dropped into my social circle at one point or another, often faded out just as quickly as they burst in. I seldom got acknowledgements of gratitude, but I felt good about what I was doing. It wasn’t until I was surprised with the high school citizenship award in grade twelve that I realized the impact that I was having on the entire student body.
The provincial government presents this high school citizenship award to a grade twelve student who makes incredible contributions to their student body as a whole and to the community at large. There are only four recipients per year, so this is quite a prestigious honor to be chosen among the applicants.
Ever since high school graduation, I’ve crossed paths with many former classmates who all seem to ask the same question: “Weren’t you lonely back in junior high and high school?” My response is of course no.
I was too busy with extra-curricular activities. I attended every single basketball, volleyball, football and hockey game under the sun, was on school council for two years, volunteered on the yearbook and graduation committees, was a participant on the school reach team, was the volunteer Sunday school teacher at the local church and still managed to maintain my reputation as the most popular babysitter around. I had no time to be bored or lonely. When I wasn’t doing extra-curricular activities, there was always homework to be done, as my parents were always insistent on bringing home good grades. Plus, I had a part-time job in high school.
Whenever I needed someone to talk to myself, there were many adults who were willing to lend an ear. To teachers, parents, and grandparents alike, I was an inspiration, and they often said they would do anything for me. Plus, I was lucky enough to have immense family support.
While most people would be very bitter about the kind of school experience I had, I think things worked out for the best. Being a so-called drifter during my junior high and high school years I had no distinct ties with one social group or another. As such, I will be able to gain favor with all the students I teach on some level, and never have to worry about favoritism. This is because I see the beauty/potential in everyone. I know that sounds corny, but I don’t know any other way to describe my unique perception of the world around me.

Profession Can Be Such a Dirty Word

2004-12-04T19:32:00.000-08:00

December 3, 2004
In our class discussion today about whether or not teaching is a profession, I was pretty adamant that the title of teacher and professional go hand-in-hand. My belief that teaching is a profession is founded on many functionalist principles.
First off, I had to endure five years of university training that will end up putting me $40,000 in debt by the time I am looking for a full-time job. Even though it may sound arrogant, I’m going to display my degrees in my house, and sign my name with those cool initials. Basically, I want recognition for my hard work. With the above comment, it is extremely apparent that I am the kind of person who considers teaching to be a part of my identity. I can’t wait to write teacher on all those forms that ask for your occupation. As well, some of the most influential people in my life were teachers, and I want to make a difference in the life of a child. I’ve always had this innate desire to help people, and I can’t see any better way to make an impact than by targeting the future of our society. All these kids need is someone to believe in their capabilities. As someone with a disability, I know I can serve as an inspiration, and will work extra hard to ensure all my students have the opportunity to succeed. I see myself as providing an altruistic service; I’m here to help people.
After reading the above response, I came upon a very harsh realization. In the end, the title “professional” carries three main benefits: money, status, and control. In all honesty, if someone were to ask me “Why did you become a teacher?” my response would not include any of those benefits mentioned above. I mean let’s face it! The salaries of a teacher are not something to brag about, most teachers fail to get public recognition for their accomplishments, and even if a teacher gets to take holidays all the time, teaching is a full-time job whether you are in the school or not.
Ultimately, I decided to enter the teaching profession because I firmly believe one of the greatest gifts you can give a child is a solid education. Just being able to say I contributed to that special gift makes me happy, and happiness should be everyone’s guiding light when faced with choosing a career.
This made me realize I don’t care whether teaching is a profession or not; I would still be striving towards this goal. Money, status and control don’t buy happiness; at least not for me. I've realized my true opinion of professionalism is that it breeds corruption. I was not proud of the type of person being conveyed at the beginning of this entry.
Thanks Robert for such a great class! It provoked so much thought, that I finally realized I was basing my belief of whether teaching was a profession on things that matter to society and not on what matters to me. I’ve always liked to think I’m my own person, but sometimes society just has a way of brainwashing you………..it’s kind of scary!!!!

The Time has Come for Homosexuality to Become Socially Acceptable

2004-12-04T19:29:00.000-08:00

December 1, 2004
First off, I have to commend Renee for the amazing amount of courage she displayed by choosing to speak out on a very controversial issue. The topic of her in-class presentation today was gay/lesbian teachers.
As someone who comes from a religious background, I find it deeply discouraging that many faiths condemn the sexual preferences and practices of gays and lesbians. After all, what does their sexual orientation have to do with who they are as a person and what they believe? The answer is nothing!
I also resent that fact that individuals believe they can pinpoint who is gay/lesbian based on observation. There are no distinct behaviours or appearances that perpetuate through the entire gay and lesbian population. Nor should we expect there to be because we are all unique individuals, and this fact has been scientifically proven.
Even though this is how I feel, I have to admit, I am guilty of allowing the perpetuation of discrimination towards gays and lesbians continue. This is mostly because I grow tired of correcting my parents and siblings of their inappropriate comments or assumptions.
For example, my brother has always appeared somewhat effeminate to his masculine friends. I think this can mostly be attributed to the fact he grew up with sisters. However, he still gets teased for liking certain types of music and movies because the stereotypical audience is female. Over time, I believe my brother got fed up with being picked on, and began making comments like “That’s so gay” and “He’s a fag” to gain acceptance from his peers. Although I’ve tried to correct his behaviour, I’ve come to realize my brother justifies his actions because my parents engage in the same type of practice.
My father is so homophobic, if my brother admitted to being gay, I swear he would ship him off to a mental institution, and completely disown him. Although my mother would not react as drastically, she doesn’t fair much better. She once openly accused my best friend of being gay because he was a guy who had more in common with a girl (than other guys). Her suspicion was fueled even more by the fact that he showed no interest in dating me. As far as my mother is concerned, any guy who appears effeminate has to be gay, no exceptions.
I have a few gay/lesbian friends, and admire all of the gay/lesbian people I’ve come into contact with. They are all smart, funny, talented, and compassionate individuals. However, I often forget how difficult it is for them to be truthful to the whole world about their identity, simply because of discrimination. Although I may not directly witness it, I now realize all these people are trapped by intolerance in one way or another. Through her presentation, Renee has inspired me deconstruct popular myths, and do what I can to eliminate homophobia. After all, there was a time when women were seen as inferior to men, blacks were seen as inferior to whites etc, but change was possible. All it took was people in the majority to stand up for people in the minority, forcing everyone in a position of authority to admit their faults. The time has come for homosexuality to become socially acceptable.

The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy and its Influence on my Unique Perspective

2004-12-04T19:26:00.000-08:00

November 29, 2004
The presentation today on self-fulfilling prophecy was quite interesting. For those of you who may be unfamiliar with this concept, the self-fulfilling prophecy is a theory that states a teacher makes judgments about students based on gender, race, given name, surname, dialect, appearance, interests, or even special needs. Many times, this judgment is unintentional however, the teacher will then form expectations of each student based on these judgments, and treat them accordingly.
As a student with a disability who was fully integrated into the regular classroom, I know I fell victim to this theory many times. The majority of my teachers had very low expectations of me, and as a result, report card periods were very stressful for me. There were many times I didn’t know how to interpret my letter grades.
If I got a C, I often found myself saying the teacher was prejudice, and wasn’t paying any attention to the quality of my work. They only rewarded me with the grade they felt I deserved based on their expectations. In other words, low expectations in my thought processes equaled a C. Therefore, when my parents yelled at me for getting a bad grade, I never felt like it was my own fault.
At the other side of the spectrum, when I got an A, I often found myself thinking, “Is this a pity mark?” or “Did I only receive this A only because I exceeded their very low expectations of me? Meaning the work I produced may not have actually been a true reflection of that caliber, but it was impressive by their previously held standards?” Basically, I never once felt like I deserved the grade I received because I was consciously aware of this stupid self-fulfilling prophecy-at least that was true until high school. By then, I knew high marks equaled scholarships, and they wouldn’t be given out A’s to just anyone.
Because I am so hyper sensitive to this self-fulfilling prophecy phenomenon, I try really hard not to fall victim to it. After all, I don’t want to be a hypocrite. However, this is easier said than done. When Angela handed out a sheet at the beginning her presentation with a bunch of brief character sketches that she wanted us to form an opinion on. Since I’m a firm believer of not judging a book by it’s cover, I basically refused to complete the assignment. Any comments I did write down were pretty general. For example, next to the person who was smoking outside I wrote this person has a very bad habit, however, this should have no bearing on who they are as a person or what they can accomplish.
Even though many people see it as unfortunate that I was a victim of the self-fulfilling prophecy, given what I wrote down on that sheet of paper, I consider it to be a blessing in disguise. After all, it gave me a whole different perspective on the world around me that I know will serve me well in the teaching profession.

Even Travelling to the Other Side of the Country Can Make You Doubt Your Intelligence

2004-12-01T21:15:00.000-08:00

November 27, 2004
After reading Owen’s blog on the Antibias Curriculum, I was reminded of a similar culture shock experience I had while taking a semester worth of courses at Laval University in Quebec City.
Because I am a French major, part of my degree requirement is going on a French exchange for four months. I chose to do this in my third year after I took most of the intermediate level French classes at the U of L. As a result, I was pretty confident in my language fluency, and was looking forward to being placed in the advanced French classes in Quebec. However, we all had to write a placement test upon arrival. I found the test to be very difficult; mostly because it was in a multiple-choice format and you were always instructed to pick the BEST answer. Whether nerves got the best of me, or I became seriously intimidated, I scored really low on the test. To make matters worse, nobody really understood my disability, and assumed my physical limitations justified my test score. Basically, everybody in Quebec underestimated my ability, and as a result I was stuck in a lower level French class that was not going to allow any progression in my knowledge of the French language.
Perhaps the only bonus to everyone’s ignorance was the fact that I got to spend more time socializing than working on homework. They say this is the best way to learn a language anyways. The fact of the matter was, I needed more practice holding a conversation. My favorite topics to talk about in french revolved around school and the weather. How boring is that?

N'ACH (Need for Achievement)

2004-11-30T13:30:00.000-08:00

November 25, 2004
After discussing the need for achievement model in class yesterday, I have to admit, this idea really tweaked my interest-even if it is outdated. Without a doubt, if I were given a garbage can and a basketball in this movie, I would have been a kid testing the boundary and asking myself how far back can I stand and still make a basket. Why? I always like a good challenge. However, I fail to see how this desire for competition could make me successful. It could go either way! Constantly pushing the boundary can also lead to failure. This is mostly because setting high expectations for oneself also leads to a dangerous thing called perfectionism. As everyone is well aware, it’s impossible to be perfect all the time. However, if you have those high expectations, some tasks are never officially completed. In the workforce, this is a dangerous reality thanks to a little thing called deadlines. If you are unable to make these deadlines, there goes your job and any previous dreams you had of success.
The guy standing right over top of his garbage can may have a good thing going for him in the end. At least he can count on the outcome, and receive the prize of a promotion in the end instead of having to look for another job. While it is true simple equals boring, simple may also be safer in some instances.
I think I would have be a Miss. Devil’s Advocate if I would have taken a Sociology of Education course 30 years ago that was focused on this need for achievement model. However, I do like to argue…just ask me how many debate competitions I won in junior high school.

The Five Models of Failure-A Critique

2004-11-30T13:28:00.000-08:00

November 24, 2004
I hate playing what appears to be a blame game in our Sociology of Education class. Lately, we’ve been discussing the Five Models of Failure, and each model has a different idea of who is at fault.

Our initial idea was that the individual was to blame for his or her own circumstances. As expected, this didn’t fly for very long. After all, how much influence does one person possess when it comes to dictating how the country is run? The answer is one vote out of approximately 30 million. From where I stand, those aren’t very good odds. The only thing that one might seriously control is our outlook on life, and this may influence where we end up in the end.

Then we moved to saying that some kids fail because of troubled family backgrounds. We all come from dysfunctional families on one level or another, so who are we to pass judgement? Most parents do the best job they know how to do, and we can expect nothing more. If we look to point fingers, this is definitely the wrong direction to be facing.

The next target was the culture in which some kids were raised. As someone who has never thought about becoming a member of the KKK and pledging white supremacy, I vow to never fall victim to the culture of poverty idea that says your language or beliefs are wrong because they do not conform to upper class ideals. Every culture has value and deserves to be maintained at all cost. I believe it is possible to teach people what they need to know without resorting to forced assimilation.

The last model we looked at before the end of class dealt with class structure. It basically said a family transmits a distinct set of values to their children. Ultimately, this limits them to the occupational level of their parents. Even though my parents raised me with a strong set of working class values, I desire more than that. I have already obtained a higher level of education than anyone else in my family, and want to establish a career for myself before having any children. Of course, this is all foreign territory to my parents, however they respect my decisions, and I respect theirs.

So far, I have managed to find exceptions to every one of these models. What I find funny is that we have yet to discuss the teacher’s role in the failure of a child. Since society expects the schools to train the up and coming generation, why hasn’t the finger been pointed this direction? I’m sure teachers’ attitudes affect a student’s performance. After all, I remember blaming bad marks on the fact that certain teachers really didn’t like me.

Inclusive Education-Good for all?

2004-11-30T13:27:00.000-08:00

November 22, 2004
During my extensive research on the subject of inclusive education, I found many articles published that argued inclusive education may not meet the needs of bright students. One article in particular entitled “Inclusive Education-Good for all? A Parent Perspective” by Debra Chinchilla really caught my attention.

Throughout the article Chinchilla highlights many of the trials and tribulations her gifted son encountered in the regular school system. While enrolled in a French Immersion Kindergarten, this child was immediately coded as gifted. By the end of kindergarten, his French skills were at a grade 3 level. However, his teachers gave him more of the same work to keep him busy; not differentiated curriculum. The time he did spend in a special pull-out scenario was ineffective as he was expected to pursue his interests in French, but did not have the vocabulary background to be successful. As time went on, he came to view himself as smarter than all his classmates. This attitude and self-portrayal caused an evaporation of his willingness to work. He preferred to do nothing at all except read so the teachers let him disappear to the library for hours on end.

Of course his parents were appalled at the obvious lack of instruction. However, when they confronted the teachers, they were told it was their fault, and that they shouldn’t have introduced him to reading, math, and science at such an early age. Determined no to let their son’s negative attitude about school persist, and significantly worried about the lack of instruction, the parents decided to enroll their son in an academic challenge program. This proved to be a difficult transition. He was no longer the smartest in the class, and had to work to achieve academic success. Lots of whining and complaining was the result. However, over time the attitude of this particular student changed from a bored, unwilling worker to a child who works when he needs to achieve an objective, and occasionally works really hard just for fun.

Obviously for the writer of this article the answer to the question “Can a gifted student’s educational needs be met in mixed ability groups” is obviously no. Her reasons are as follows:
1) It is especially hard for a young child to stay motivated, when all of his/her classmates have no interest in what he or she is doing, or if they are interested they remain observers unable to contribute anything new. This results in loneliness and isolation in a mixed-ability classroom for any gifted student.
2) As well, some of the bright kids may be asked to peer-tutor, putting another barrier in between the gifted students and the rest of the class. This easily results in nicknames like “teacher’s pet”.

The author of this article concludes her argument against inclusion by stating there is no greater inequality than the equal treatment of unequals (Chinchilla, 1993).
Even though I do agree with this last statement, I do not agree that a gifted child must be placed in a challenged program to ensure they are intellectually stimulated. Clearly the teachers who had this gifted boy in their class were inexperienced in dealing with the gifted, and were not ready to admit their weaknesses. Gifted students can (and should) be fully integrated into the regular classroom. This is because the emotional and social growth of gifted children lags behind their intellectual capacity. Hanging out with age-appropriate peers will satisfy this deficit quite well. Teachers just have to educate themselves about gifted and talented students in general, get to know the gifted children in their classes well enough to cater to their interests while addressing some challenges, and acquire resources and a support group that can be consulted in times of need. After all, it’s not easy keeping a gifted student interested

Victimization Caused by the Social Construction of Intelligence

2004-11-20T23:09:00.000-08:00

November 19. 2004
Whether we admit it or not, we’ve all been victimized by the social construction of intelligence. It causes vicious, and unnecessary competition that often destroys an individual’s self-esteem. I’ve already briefly mentioned how lack of ability has pretty harshly labeled my brother in the school system, and how it’s changed his attitude toward school and teachers in general. But even the students deemed successful in the regular school system are at risk of victimization.

I was always labeled the smart kid by students and teachers alike, so it comes as no surprise that after awhile I started to expect the A’s and the scholarship money. I knew if I didn’t receive this level of gratification, life as I knew it, would come crashing down.

Out of the blue, I began struggling early in my Social Studies 30 class. Test after test, I was turning up mediocre grades. At first, I thought it was a reflection on me (i.e. I was having a bad day, or I didn’t understand the curriculum), but after Professor Runte’s comment in class today, I know my grades in no way reflected how well I knew the curriculum. After all, when it came time to write the essay for the diploma exam, I did an awesome job. Plus, my Social Studies 10 and 20 marks were through the roof. The reason I ended up with such a low grade in the course overall was a reflection of my teacher’s assessment practice. He would always produce pages of old multiple choice diploma questions to use as our unit tests. Without fail, I would always become discouraged because I never understood what the questions were asking, and resort to guessing. It now is apparent, that in grade twelve I was not reading at a university level, which is the level of comprehension these multiple choice questions are constructed to model. After barely passing Social Studies 30, it is no surprise I began to doubt my abilities to teach a subject like social studies, and quickly changed my major from Sociology to French. Sadly, this is a prime example of how society and individuals place too much value on grades, which are based on an artificial concept known as intelligence.

On a similar note, my roommate always had a terrible time finding summer employment. Eventually, I agreed to help her improve her resume, and interviewing techniques. One summer, I asked her to keep me updated on the job searching. It surprised and shocked me that she confessed to having failed personality or written exams that she was given by possible employers such as Canadian Tire and Home Depot. Back then I failed to understand how your score on a personality or written exam (with quadratic equations) could have any bearing on whether or not you would make a good employee. After all, how do they expect you to answer the detailed questions they were asking with no prior experience or training? From my point of view, what these employers were asking seemed like impossible tasks, and I had no idea how to help prepare her for future exams of this caliber. Again, after today’s class, I now understand what was going on here. These companies are looking for people who will effectively represent management’s beliefs and values. A person’s score on these exams has no reflection on their actual intelligence. However, the only reason these employers give for not hiring individuals like my roommate is you failed our exam. Thereby communicating the message that “you are stupid” and making unemployed people feel responsible for their situation when ultimately society is to blame for the amount of emphasis they place on the artificial reality of intelligence.

In the intelligence game, everybody is bound to come up a loser at least once, so why do we continue to hold this arbitrary concept in such high esteem? It really makes no sense!

The Prevalence of Social Darwinism Rears its Ugly Head

2004-11-20T23:07:00.000-08:00

November 17, 2004
Talking to my mom today, I was reminded just how prevalent the Social Darwinism model of success still is in everyday society. As a student in my sixth year of university working towards the completion of a five-year degree, many people are becoming skeptical of my abilities.
For starters, when I first mentioned the idea that I would be taking an extra year of university, my parents automatically assumed it was because I had slacked off somewhere in the last five years. When I tried to explain that this decision in no way reflected my degree of commitment, they just laughed and told me to tell the truth. I know they assumed there was some degree of backsliding that I had to make up for (whether it was my own fault, due to peer pressure, or caused by the spell of some guy). The truth of the matter was, through trial and error, I had determined I could achieve better grades if I took four classes instead of five (especially if my semester included French or chemistry classes-which are the subjects I chose to focus on for my degree). Instead of forcing myself to take five classes and rush through to the finish line like most people only to receive mediocre grades, I decided finishing at my own pace with grades I was proud of would be more of an accomplishment. To this day, I don’t think my parents full believe the motive behind my actions.

To top it all off, many of my past teachers (most of which marveled at my abilities), are starting to also question why I am not finished my degree. These teachers are all fully aware of when I graduated from high school, and know how long I’ve been in university. In fact, many of these teachers expressed a desire for me to take their jobs once I graduated. That only applies however, if I decide to go back to my hometown. After hearing about the conversations they’ve had with my mother, I honestly think they are starting to plant seeds of doubt in regards to my ability. For some reason, they see taking longer to finish a degree as a negative thing. They fail to see that an extra year of courses gives me a more diverse background, and that I can demand a hire starting salary due to me level of education. I admit that it would have been ideal to graduate with my friends, and already be a full-time member of the workforce, but if it didn’t turn out that way, why does everyone assume the worst? Ultimately this clearly developed attitude is going to cast a shadow over my PS3 placement, which I have to do closer to home due to lack of funds. I will definitely have a lot to prove to some of these teachers that think I’ve become a slacker or something, and that’s added pressure I didn’t count on facing.

Teaching is Not Only a Profession, but an Art

2004-11-20T22:59:00.000-08:00

November 15, 2004
In our sociology of education text, Barakett and Cleghorn (2002) address whether or not teaching is a full profession since the responsibilities, rights, and duties are not fully compatible to those of say a dentist or lawyer (pg. 48). In their argument, they address such issues as accountability, the client relationship, and prior knowledge.

When it comes to accountability, Barakett and Cleghorn (2002) admit that a teacher is obliged to teach children to the best of his/her ability, however the teacher is not legally responsible for the results. In other words, success or failure to learn belongs to the child.
I disagree with that last statement, especially when it comes to provincial achievement test grade levels. Every mark a child receives on assignments or exams is filtered through some degree of administration (or as is the case with provincial exams, even public scrutiny). If your students are not learning the designated curriculum, you are held MORALLY responsible which I think is a bigger deal than being legally responsible. In the end, you may not be sued a bunch of money, but a judgement will be made about your character that will make it hard to remain in the teaching profession, or switch careers because you couldn’t even communicate your thoughts and ideas to children.

The second argument clearly spells out that the teacher-student client relationship is not direct (Barakett and Cleghorn, 2002). Stated another way, teachers do not bill students directly for their services, but rather are paid for by educational authorities-the government, the school board, the community. I believe this is how education should be paid for since ultimately, these students will be serving the common good of society at the end of their education program (regardless of the level of educational attainment). The government, school board, and community will be repaid ten fold when the student obtains a job and begins paying taxes. These organizations will see even more money if these past students decide to have children of their own. Whether the relationship is direct or indirect then appears to have no significant bearing on the functionality of this relationship. The ultimate goal of a teacher is to provide training to make students competent workers in their field or trade. Society appears to still be functioning, so teachers must be doing something right. The only flaw in this argument exists with the people who live off social assistance. However, living solely off social assistance is getting harder to accomplish due to the steady increase in quality of living. Almost everybody has at least a part-time job in his/her lifetime.

The third argument states that teachers are socialized into the profession, and not educated to the same degree as doctors or lawyers who enter their field of expertise (Barakett and Cleghorn , 2002). That is, prior to entering the program, most teachers if not all, hold a distinct image of what makes a good and a bad teacher. Most of this knowledge was obtained during their prior experience as a learner. As someone who always rated my teachers, I have to admit that I did admire and aspire to be like all my favorite teachers, and vow never to be like the teachers I hated. However, prior to entering the education faculty, I was never able to pinpoint why the good teachers were so great, or why the bad teachers absolutely sucked. And even if I could nail down those characteristics, I had no idea how to prevent myself from slipping into those habits once in the real world. Ultimately, my practicum experiences give me the opportunity to practice my so-called “great” ideas at a time when I’m still allowed to make mistakes. This way, if something doesn’t work, or I have a few bad habits, there is the opportunity for correction before it costs me my job. I mean let’s face it; there’s a lot of pressure involved with being a teacher. You are responsible for the future of mankind, and sometimes that’s an overwhelming burden. If one wasn’t trained for this job position, there would be a lot of people quitting after a few years from the stress, and society would never be able to accommodate the staff turnover. Ultimately, our education extends leaps and bounds above our socialization experiences. I believe without the education, our success rate in this career would diminish. We would be doomed to make the past mistakes of all teachers we hated and even admired. Human beings are not perfect, so why do we all of a sudden think good teachers are the almighty role model?

From the above statements, it is obvious that I think teaching is not only a profession, but also an art. Even though it may be possible to acquire the technique of teaching through observation, in order to be labeled a masterpiece and deemed authentic, teaching must be learned.

What Do We Choose First-Status or Occupation?

2004-11-14T17:22:00.000-08:00

November 12, 2004
For the past 24 hours, I’ve wrestled with the question of whether we choose our desired status in society before picking a career, or if most choose a career and accept the economic status that is comes with it. Here is my response.
I believe the people who choose careers based on salary are the ones who end up switching jobs at least five times, and endure the dreaded mid-life crisis. Money should never be your motive because salary is often beyond your control when applying for jobs. You often have to take what you can get. Plus, if you base success on things such as material wealth, you will often find yourself in a never-ending competition. Somebody will always be one step ahead of you. Why else do you think they invented the phrase “Keeping up with the Joneses”? This type of motivation will undoubtedly lead to endless frustration and eventual unhappiness.
On the other hand, I believe the people who choose a career based on interest often satisfactorily retire after 30+ years in the business, and have established a legacy for themselves that many admire. When asked why they’ve been teaching so long, they admit it’s because they love it. They manage to acquire personal satisfaction from their jobs. Money doesn’t seem to be a factor that influenced their decision. They just accepted whatever salary was offered with the position.
What decision-making approach sounds more appealing and/or rewarding?
Personally, I chose my career path based on interest. However, being somewhat intelligent, I was constantly bombarded with information about the careers that had the latest job demands, or offered the best pay. I don’t believe anybody had dishonorable intentions though. They just wanted to see me succeed, and didn’t want me to shut the doors on any of my options prematurely. What I failed to tell everybody though was that my mind had been made up a long time ago about what career path I was going to take. I was going to become a teacher.
By the time I started grade twelve and began sending out post-secondary applications thereby making my decision public, I met more resistance to my choice than I thought. Many people downplayed the importance of a teacher based on their mediocre status in society. I had friends scoff about the academic potential that I was wasting. After all, in their minds, anybody could become a teacher. It was a position that lacked prestige, and many saw it as an insult to my level of intelligence. Due to the relentless backlash I was getting, it came as no surprise when I started to doubt my decision. I can remember resorting to a phase where took an endless amount of those stupid career matching tests based on your interests, but every single time the career lists popped up, teaching was always listed near the top. Lucky for me, those stupid lists helped to reinforce my decision, and it was reassuring that my parents were going to support me no matter what. Now most people I meet are frustrated by the fact that I always knew what I wanted to do with my life. Usually the decision isn’t that easy. There are normally more obstacles that stand in the way. What they fail to realize though, is that I have had to modify my decision. Originally, I wanted to be a kindergarten teacher, but that’s not going to happen because I’ve realized it’s too physically demanding for me. As well, my original instinct was to teach English and Social Studies, but because there was such a high demand for other subject areas, I switched to French and Science. I had faith that I could handle the challenge. Therefore I have come to realize some of my limitations specifically within the field of education. As I sit now, my ideal job would be teaching grade four, and I hope to be able to incorporate my French background into the elementary setting thanks to that mandatory second language program that is taking effect.

What if I Don't Like My Chosen Career?

2004-11-14T17:20:00.000-08:00

November 10, 2004
I'm writing this blog sort of in response to the comments made by Tonya in her blog. I think it’s normal to contemplate the question “What if I don’t like my chosen career path?” After all, I have made a lot of sacrifices to get to where I am today.
For starters, I gave up any chance of a long-term relationship with my high school sweetheart by choosing to obtain my post-secondary degree from the U of L instead of the U of A. After all, love is a complete gamble, and I was repeatedly told if teaching was my goal, Lethbridge was the place to be. Everyone who knows me was not surprised by my decision. After all, I’m a pretty level-headed person, and chose to follow the path that lead to the greatest chance of success. Lucky for me, I have managed to stay best friends with this guy since we parted ways. This is mostly because he respects and admires my decision. Looking at the friendship we have now, I would never trade it for another chance at love. However, if teaching doesn’t work out, I know it is destined that I will always be haunted by the “what might have been.”
Secondly, I have a huge loan debt. The government or the bank has funded every year of my schooling at the U of L. By the time I finish, my loan will average $40,000. This is relatively normal for five years of university, however if I get out in the real world and decide this isn’t for me, I can’t justify spending all that money. Basically, I would look like a failure, and I have never failed at anything in my life.
Thirdly, my physical health has somewhat taken a turn for the worse since graduating from high school. I used to walk everywhere I went, but this campus is so big that I have no choice but to use a scooter to get around. This is a catch 22 situation because sitting in the scooter just gives my muscles the opportunity to seize up and get tighter. I used to have a home exercise program that I executed every night to keep myself limber, but for a while this was completely forgotten because my only priority was school and achieving the grades to get to where I want to go. It has only been in the last year that I’ve seen my mistake in this department, and have begun correcting my behaviour. My motivation stems from the fact that I know I will not be the kind of teacher I want to be without freedom of movement.
In the end, I know I’ve made the right decision in choosing teaching as my career because I am happy! Happiness will ensure that I will not fail at whatever I set out to achieve. Plus, I am not fussy about where I teach, just as long as I’m teaching. By being a teacher, I’ve been told I hold the keys to the future in the palm of my hand. I take that responsibility seriously. I want to give every kid that comes into my classroom the key to success. That’s the least that they deserve. This is how I see myself making a difference in this world. Having said all this, regardless what obstacles I face after graduation, nobody is going to tell me I’m not meant to be a teacher. This is definitely where I belong because it’s where my heart lies.

Are Your Life Prspects Determined by the Age of 7?

2004-11-14T17:16:00.000-08:00

November 9, 2004
This is a very interesting question posed by the producers of the documentary 28 UP. In this series, 12 English kids are followed through their lives as they grow up. We first meet these kids at the tender age of seven. They are all from different backgrounds economically, and since England is run on the sponsorship mobility, their educational experiences mirror their status in society. By the time all the interviews are finished at seven, everyone watching has their own theories of where these children will be by the age of 28, which is the next video we watched in our education class (even though there is 14 UP, and 21 UP, and 35 UP and most recently 42 UP).

While the personalities of these children in the documentary shine through at the age of 7 clearly dictating likes and dislikes, and their economic status is pretty much written in stone, I believe it is impossible to completely predict their life prospects. This being said, I do not deny that your likes and dislikes, degree of talent, and SES all play an obvious role, it’s just that a person's environment can easily change upseting all of these factors.

For example, when I was seven years old, I was taking piano lessons. I had a huge amount of talent, and enjoyed expressing myself through music. I was also fortunate enough to have the best piano teacher in the area (money wasn’t a factor). When asked what I wanted to be when I grew up, I always said a concert pianist. However, by the age of nine, the environment I was living in drastically changed. My mother got engaged, making it impossible for her to claim financial assistance as a single parent. This extra money awarded by the government was paying for my piano lessons, and without it I was forced to quit. In other words, the environment that I was living in no longer fostered my interest and/or talent. As a child, I had very little control over my environment. There was no way I could tell my mom not to get married, but this marriage I was not consulted about required that I change my outlook on life. Without the lessons, I knew there was no way I could become a famous concert pianist.

I can reach the same conclusion with my roommate. At the age of seven, she was taking art lessons. She had a huge amount of talent, and thoroughly enjoyed expressing herself through art. Knowing this, her parents stopped at nothing to ensure she had the best art teacher. When asked what she wanted to be when she grew up, her response was interior designer. However, in high school the art teacher just decided she didn’t like my roommate. There was an obvious personality conflict. The quality of artwork my roommate produced continued to improve (according to her private teacher), but the marks she would achieve on school assignments steadily declined. Of course, my roommate’s parents took their concerns to the principal of the school, but because there were no other complaints filed, the teacher didn’t lose her job. In fact, she just made my roommate’s life worse. Eventually, my roommate began to lose confidence in her abilities, and stopped working on her art portfolio for design school. Besides she knew her art teacher would never give her the recommendation she needed to get into the design school of her choice. She completely switched focus from art to academics, where at least her grades continued to reflect the degree of effort she put in to her assignments.

Therefore, unpredictable factors such as marriages, crushing failures, moving from one place to another, and even mental distress can wreak havoc on being able to predict where one will end up. In case you are wondering, I am one year away from finishing my degree in French and Education, and my roommate graduated last year with a Biochemistry degree and is employed by a pharmaceutical company in Edmonton.

Are We Adequately Preparing Future Teachers?

2004-11-07T23:15:00.000-08:00

November 5, 2004
The debate of what teachers need to know before entering the classroom got raised in my individualized instruction class the other day, and I want to make a few comments on that.
When posed with the question of what teachers need to know, the most popular answers are: a) the subject they teach, b) teaching methods and c) knowledge of various learning styles (Barakett and Cleghorn, 2000, p.52). Despite this knowledge, universities across the country continue to inadequately prepare graduates in all three of these areas.
At the University of Lethbridge for example, I was required to take seventeen courses in my proposed major (all of which undoubtedly exceed the level of knowledge I will be teaching my future students), and only one education class centred on how to teach my proposed major. To me, this seems backwards. I think the university focuses too much on becoming an expert in our chosen majors instead of telling us how to share our acquired knowledge with others. This happens despite the fact that good teachers are not necessarily the experts in their field, but the ones that make learning a reality in their classroom. Learning can only occur if the teacher is successful in transmitting the knowledge they have acquired to their students in an effective manner.
As far as teaching methods are concerned, we are provided with a few examples that have proven to be effective while in the faculty of education. However, if your teaching style doesn’t match any of these methods, you are left high and dry to figure out by trial and error what works for you. This is also not fair. We should be provided with resources that dictate other teaching methods available, or the education classes should be more student-directed so that our peers will model other examples of teaching methods not addressed by the main professor.
As far as becoming aware of different learning styles is concerned, there is only one class at the University of Lethbridge that deals with differentiated instruction extensively, and it is not mandatory. Considering that every classroom is incredibly unique as a result of the inclusion movement and increasing cultural diversity, this is not necessarily a smart decision. Up and coming teachers will more than likely encounter diversity in their practicum experiences, and most will not have the tools to effectively deal with the situation. This provides unnecessary frustration, increases the likelihood of dropping out, and/or leads to early career switching. Although we don’t want to scare new teachers, we must prepare them for reality.
If we really believe that teachers need to know the subject their teaching, teaching methods, and knowledge of various learning styles, we honestly need to take a look at modifying how we prepare up and coming teachers for their future responsibilities.

Contest and Sponsored Mobility

2004-11-07T23:13:00.000-08:00

November 3, 2004
After reading Ralph Turner’s article entitled “Sponsored and Contest Mobility and the School System”, I would have to say Canadians have for the most part bought into the idea of contest mobility. We believe everybody should have equal opportunity to succeed, and that striving for success is a lifelong goal. Why else would my sister have been granted the opportunity to attend the U of L without having Math 30 in her repertoire? When success is achieved, we reserve the right to brag about our achievements. After all, my mom has an entire wall in our house reserved for all my rewards, high school diploma, and soon to be university degree. It is also true that we all achieve success and elite status differently. My cousin is enjoying elite status through marriage, and some of my friends from high school are living comfortably due to popularity. I plan on achieving my elite status through hard work in academics. If I succeed in my goal, it is also true that I will look down on my cousin and friends from high school for taking the so-called “easy way out”. This feeling stems from my belief that status is something that one earns through a combination of hard work and talent, not by chance.
However, as more and more competing elites enter into Canadian society, I believe we run the risk of moving over to a more sponsored mobility standpoint. This is because once elite status is achieved; many naturally have the desire to pass this lifestyle onto family and friends. Therefore, successful family businesses merely get passed down from generation to generation. So-called “heirs” to the throne know their roles, and continue to accept their place in society regardless of personal wants or desires.
For example, I had a very smart friend in high school whose family owned a farming empire. Even though she had the marks to go to university and become a doctor, she married a guy with a farming background right out of high school, and settled into the role of being a farmer’s wife. She accepted this role because she was the oldest and it was her duty to take over the farm-no questions asked.
This acceptance of what you’ve been given also explains why the gap between the rich and poor in today’s society continues to widen. Although there is always the option of refusing your “crown”, doing so would result in an unknown future. We are all scared of the unknown, which is why many people do not hesitate in accepting what is laid before them. After all, it is guaranteed stability. However, there will always continue to be exceptions to the rule dictating that we will never be complete acceptors of sponsored mobility.

The Hidden Curriculum

2004-11-07T23:09:00.000-08:00

November 1, 2004
The hidden curriculum refers to all those things that are taught and learned in school that are not part of the official curriculum. This would include all the unwritten rules that children encounter when first integrated into the school system. These rules have to do with such matters as expectations (work must be neat and completed on time), behaviour (no running in the hallways, no vulgar language, no chewing gum), and the establishment of roles (teacher vs. student) among other things. The school also serves as a transmitter of cultural values, norms, and dispositions, which can also be included in the hidden curriculum.
This being said, from the time students step foot inside your classroom on the first day of school, you are sending them a message. If you are asking how, my response would be, simple arrangement of the classroom speaks volumes. If you have your desks all in rows facing the teacher’s desk, this clearly states who’s in charge. If you have the desks arranged in groups, this clearly states that this is a team effort and the only demand is mutual respect.
This hidden curriculum is an overall scary concept. After all, no teacher wants to intentionally damage a young child’s impressionable mind. We want to be idea makers and not idea breakers. However, everything we teach is enforcing the status quo, or going against it. As we are all aware, learning doesn’t take place in a vacuum. No matter how hard we try, subconscious attitudes and opinions are always going to find their way to the surface.
Maybe the solution to the hidden curriculum lies in teaching our students to be critical consumers of information. This means teaching the necessary content, but allowing discussion and questioning. Any questions brought up in class should be answered as fully as possible. This may mean doing outside research, but it will make you a more well-rounded teacher. Chances are this freedom to question will provide students with the opportunity to explore their interests and make the content relevant to their personal environments. In the end, teachers just need to be aware of time constraints, and be able to provide evidence that their students learned the outlined curriculum. How you reach that endpoint really shouldn’t matter.
Even though some people are going to question whether the needs of the establishment are being met with this “critical thinkers” mentality, I would have to say we live in a democratic society. As such, we are all supposed to have a say in our future. It is not a true democracy unless we are informed voters. Teaching students to think critically will only allow them to effectively decipher all the information they are being given before going to the polls. This will thereby strengthen democracy, thus serving the needs of the establishment that decided we are a democratic country.

Be an Informed Voter

2004-10-30T16:02:00.000-07:00

October 29, 2004
I really fail to understand why we, as a society of fairly educated people on average, continue to let politicians like Ralph Klein (who have a dismal education background) make enormously important education policy and curriculum decisions. By now we are all aware of the fact that when our children do poorly in school, the first people to get blamed are the teachers and the parents. The politicians don’t even get mentioned even though they are the ones supplying the schools with crappy resources. Honestly, what do they know about picking out a textbook, or the value of a good teaching staff? Without being on the front lines every day, the answer is probably not much. Therefore, why do we continue to let these politicians have the final say on everything? It just doesn’t make any sense!
I’m not suggesting that we relinquish all provincial control over education. I realize if we did that, we could no longer claim national unity on curriculum, which I believe is important for the kids who are forced to move around all their lives. Besides, the Alberta system is fairly good about outlining the curriculum, but not telling you exactly how to teach it. We as Alberta teachers, still have the option of incorporating creativity, which I believe is an important quality in successful teaching.
I am suggesting however, that we vocalize as a province the importance of education and force the government to put money back into this priceless resource. Ever since Klein came into power, he has made drastic cuts to education, and continues to see this as the only way to balance the budget. This has resulted in major teacher discontent, and everybody knows when the teachers aren’t happy it’s the students that suffer. Even if you don’t have kids of your own, it is impossible to deny the fact that kids are our future. We need to invest more into our future before it is too late.
With the next provincial election hot on our heels, we all need to do our part in becoming informed voters. Make sure the party voted into power has the future of our province (the kids) at heart.

Year-round Schooling

2004-10-30T15:53:00.000-07:00

October 27, 2004
All this talk about educational policy has got me thinking about our current education system and its flaws. One of my biggest complaints revolves around how we structure the school year.
I fail to understand the benefit of a two-month summer vacation for either the teachers or the students. It doesn’t do the teachers any justice because they have to spend September and October re-teaching the basic concepts from the year before. This is because everything builds on previous knowledge (especially in elementary school). From the student’s perspective, most of them are bored out of their minds after two weeks of freedom even if they don’t admit it. They need to be kept entertained. In the name of entertainment, I see no harm in keeping the creative juices flowing. If you haven’t been able to guess already, my proposed solution to these drawbacks is year-round schooling.
I see a year-round policy as helping to reduce the increasing trend of teacher burnout as well. Having regular breaks gives teachers the relaxation periods they need to de-stress (if need be), or simply re-energize. Maybe then, the good teachers could remain active members in the school system for longer periods of time instead of being forced into early retirement.
With the year-round schooling, children will also remain more accessible to their peers. This is especially true for rural kids who have to rely on transportation to get them to and from school on a daily basis. It is not unusual for farm kids to go the whole summer without contact from their friends. This is simply not healthy. We all need our friends on a regular basis, if not for support than for mere socialization. Our family can’t always meet these needs.
I feel parents and teachers would also deal with less behavioural issues with a year-round school program. This is simply because kids would not have to be completely re-integrated into the school “routine” that includes observing a bedtime, following classroom/school rules, and completing homework after a two-month holiday.
This is not to say that I don’t recognize some of the major drawbacks of year-round schooling-the least of which would be functioning in the extreme heat thanks to scorching temperatures in July and August. As well, teacher commitment to this type of school system could be problematic as many join the profession because of the guaranteed two-month summer vacation. I also recognize the costs to implement this type of program would be huge. However, I truly believe the benefits easily outweigh the drawbacks. Year-round schooling is the answer.

Hutterite Colonies-Should We Intervene?

2004-10-30T15:45:00.000-07:00

October 25, 2004
I found it quite interesting that one of the modern issues in Alberta education appears to be Hutterite schools and whether or not their educating practices should be modified. As my mom got her first teacher assistant job on a Hutterite colony, I feel obliged to speak up on this issue.
My mom found it very frustrating to watch very smart kids (boys and girls alike) walk out the school doors on their fourteenth birthday never to receive another drop of education. After all, if given the opportunity, many of those children could become the next doctor, lawyer, or even teacher. Now, there are many people out there who believe Hutterites are given the choice to stay or leave the colony, and if they really wanted to continue their education they would. However, let us take a closer look at the stakes sitting on this traditional practice.
At the age of fourteen, Hutterites believe children have received enough basic education to be successful contributors to their community. The young boys are expected to go and help the men in the fields, and the young girls are expected to join the women in the homes-cooking and cleaning. If everyone assumes their pre-destined roles in the colony, they should be able to maintain their culture and continue to live comfortably.
However, the outside world seems to be continually threatening their simple life. My mom was constantly probed with questions because she was seen an outlet into the unknown. They always wanted to listen to the car radio, become familiar with the latest fashion trends, find out about the latest movies and television shows, drive her vehicles, and hear the latest on what we (her children) were doing. Their overall curiosity was high, and many children expressed the desire to visit my mom at home. Who can blame them though? Things always seem greener on the other side of the fence.
Leaving the colony was always a permanent decision though. Once you left, there was no coming back. You immediately severed ties to your family (and only support network), and job opportunities were minimal with only a grade nine education. If you were a woman, the situation was even bleaker because you couldn’t operate a motor vehicle.
In the end, it’s easy to see why so many agree to the Hutterite way of life. It’s in the name of acceptance, safety, and security. There is no “real” choice here because surviving on your own is next to impossible given the sheltered upbringing.
Now we could always level the playing field for Hutterite children by insisting that everyone must graduate from high school. However, more education only increases the chances of rebellion, and we would probably witness the destruction of another ancient culture (the first being the Native Americans). Seeing the devastating effects of Native assimilation into Western culture, I would honestly not want to claim responsibility for something like that. I think we just need to sit back and let them come to terms with the changing society when they are ready to do so. At least then, they will maintain their identities and most importantly their dignity.

Child-Centred versus Curriculum-Centred Teaching-the Debate

2004-10-24T16:46:00.000-07:00

October 22, 2004
Should schools develop each individual’s potential, or only that potential which society currently needs? I think this is a great question. Based on what past experience has shown, I think we should be leery about developing only the potential society needs. We are not psychics, and as such it’s impossible to predict the needs of society years in advance. By the time an individual actually graduates with a degree, it’s been proven that the demographics of the job market have changed. Sometimes this is due to an influx of graduates in a particular field that automatically decreases the odds of obtaining the “dream” position. If you are lucky enough to come up ahead of the competition, it’s not necessarily a winning scenario. Because there is a huge populace of candidates that have the necessary skills to replace you, it’s impossible to demand a high starting salary. This trend is known as “cheapening the labour force”. Other times, you have a job waiting for you once you’ve got the necessary documentation, and you can demand your salary. This can often be accredited to economic booms or recent retirements.
On the other side of this debate, developing each individual’s potential doesn’t guarantee they will be active contributors to society either. If there are no jobs available highlighting a need for your level of training, the fact that you have a degree becomes obsolete. Driven by the fact that you need money to live, you take any job you can get. If you end up working at McDonald’s with a university degree, the public purse has just lost $40,000 and a possibly great employee in your field of expertise. This is because anybody can work at McDonald’s. You do not need a high degree of intelligence to succeed in a fastfood franchise, and It’s not a prestigious job that carries a high degree of status.
In reality, this issue isn’t merely black or white. I believe the best solution lies somewhere in the gray department. In order to keep children interested in school, teachers should focus on a child-centred curriculum in elementary and junior high. Then in high school, teachers should begin highlighting the possible careers their students could pursue considering their strengths and interests. Under no circumstances should a student be told what they are doing, even if you are trying to prevent discouragement. Life is about making mistakes and learning from them. Kids are very intuitive, and once shown their options, they usually make the best decisions for them based on personal lifelong dreams and aspirations. For some kids, salary will be the driving factor in choosing a career. For others, it will be the likelihood of obtaining a job upon graduation. Still others will only pursue their passions citing personal happiness as the ultimate goal. Given the diversity of this planet, if we are all allowed to branch off into different careers fueled by our developed potential, the job market should remain relatively stable. Of course, there are always exceptions, but you’ll always win some and lose some no matter what path is chosen. After all it’s amazing what kids can accomplish with confidence and support. Chances are, they will exceed all expectations, and things will work out for the best.
In other words, it’s unrealistic to believe you can be anything you want to be by high school. Obviously, one can’t be a pilot unless they have perfect eyesight, or a brain surgeon if they have a hand tremor. However, if you pursue a career just to satisfy others you will lack motivation. Without motivation, the chance of success drops dramatically. Even if you do enter into their career of choice, you will be void of happiness and miss the true meaning of life. It should be realistic to achieve some balance between these two extremes.

I Disapprove of "Teacher-Proofing"

2004-10-24T16:41:00.000-07:00

October 20, 2004
When my mom managed to obtain a teacher assistant position three years ago with no prior training (working with kids or with disabilities), I was really ticked off. To put it mildly, I felt like I was wasting a lot of time and money. After all, here I was spending $10,000 per year at a reputable university hoping to obtain a degree in five years that would classify me as a qualified teacher. Plus, teaching wasn’t exactly a booming job market. Positions were hard to come by, and employers wouldn’t hesitate in hiring someone with less experience if it meant they could save a little bit of money. All I want to do upon graduating is work with kids. If I can do that without a degree, I found it difficult to justify why I’m here.
While I recognize the fact that being a teacher assistant is quite a bit different than being an actual teacher, I still believe any individual working with kids in a classroom setting should have some prior experience in the field. It should not be as simple as providing teachers and their assistants with binders full of material that tell them exactly what to do on a daily basis. What about classroom and behavioural management? Even though my mom is awesome with the children she works with, she still struggles to command respect from the students as an authority figure. She approaches most kids as a “friend” first which I know to be a critical mistake. As well, she believes in making learning fun but hasn’t found the optimal balance between “fun” and “learning”. Often, the kids are having so much fun the overall learning objectives of a lesson are temporarily forgotten. This often results in constant review, which can be time-consuming. This is something else one learns with experience. Another recent struggle for my mom is establishing effective communication between parents and teachers, especially when dealing with special needs. She’s finding out the hard way that lack of support from the family can result in an uphill battle in terms of a child’s progress.
Because I’m actively involved in the training process of becoming a teacher and take classes that deal with these issues in one form or another, my mom often approaches me for advice. Since she has sacrificed so much for me and really does love her job, I feel obliged to help her. Some days though, my frustration with the whole education system for letting inexperience taint this profession is at an all-time high. This is part of the reason that some children “fall through the cracks” so easily.

Weaknesses of the Education Models Observed

2004-10-24T16:39:00.000-07:00

October 18, 2004
When my mom informed me this past weekend that my twelve year old brother managed to get himself suspended from school for “mouthing off” the teacher, I was shocked and horrified. After all, I’ve always seen teachers as authority figures that commanded and received respect from their students at all times. In other words, when I was in junior high we “tested the waters, but never dove in when the sharks were biting”. The famous line my brother always likes to throw in my face is: “Things are different now”.
As we continue to study the history of education in class and explore the different education models, I can somewhat understand the point my brother is trying to make with his rhetorical response.
Ten years ago when I stood in my brother’s shoes, my friends and I all had reasons for attending school every single day. This motivation was fueled by many factors: a) we had a desire to gain knowledge/a love for learning, b) our parents believed in the power of a good education c) the alternative to school (working in a fast food joint) was too scary to imagine-let alone live, or d) living a luxurious lifestyle with tons of money wasn’t just a dream, but a goal. My brother on the other hand, lacks any kind of motivation whatsoever. He does not possess a natural desire to learn-general consensus is that school sucks. To make matters worse, our father has lost respect for the education system over the years. This stems from the fact that he was a child who “slipped through the cracks”. School was a constant struggle that always resulted in a feeling of hopelessness. Even though our father failed to graduate from high school, he did manage to obtain a decent job. My brother tends to holdfast to the idea, if our father succeeded in scraping by, so can he. Plus, working at a fast food restaurant sounds like fun to my brother because he would be in good company with some of his long lost friends (who managed to get expelled). Finally, my brother has always been provided with everything he has ever wanted. Who needs money when you’re handed everything on a silver platter?
On top of this devaluation of education, my brother also somehow skipped the lesson on respecting authority. Although it’s difficult to pinpoint blame for this one, it doesn’t seem to help matters that media (TV, movies, music and books) seems to communicate the message that “breaking the rules is cool”. Sadly enough, my brother has managed to destroy public property, operate a motor vehicle without a license, and experiment with drugs and alcohol underage without having to suffer any major consequences. This has done wonders for his social reputation, but completely distorted all previously instilled views of right and wrong (basic morals).
In case any of you are wondering, my brother’s lack of supervision these days can be attributed to dual income families. Both my parents have to work to pay the bills, and my brother is old enough to look after himself after school for a few hours. Ten years ago, my mom didn’t have to work, and chose to be a stay at home mom. This made it difficult to get into any kind of trouble. Thus, I never pushed the envelope far enough to question the basic morals my parents taught me.
As you can see, we desperately need to reinforce the value of an education in today’s society. When kids begin to ask the question “Why do I need to know this?” we have to be ready and respond with intelligent answers. For starters, not everything we do in life is going to be fun, or possess immediate gratification. Teachers and family members have to illustrate concrete real-life examples of when we need to use math, science, language arts, or social studies principles. The message that everything we learn has relevance must be communicated on a regular basis. Don’t harbour the attitude it’s all useless information. In terms of authority, it might be time to return to the basics. Instead of abusing the power that comes with many positions in society, it might be better just to stick to the age-old analogy of “respect your elders”. At least then we’re all on the same playing field.